Saddam Hussein after being captured by the United States.




Welcome back to this week's edition of American Dissident Voices. I'm your host, Erich Gliebe.

In case you haven't been paying attention to what's been happening in Iraq lately, it's been another exciting and violent month. I must admit that it is hard to pay too close attention to the events in Iraq because it all sounds much the same day after day. The so-called "insurgents" -- some would call them Iraqi freedom fighters -- keep attacking the troops of Iraq's puppet government as well as the hapless American soldiers unlucky enough to have been sent over to that festering sore of a nation.

The insurgents have kept up their guerilla war on their internal enemies as well as on the Americans, and they also continue to find new and more innovative ways to carry out their struggle. Within the last week, for example, militants in sedans ambushed a convoy of buses filled with recruits for Iraq's police forces. Rebels have also launched attacks using bicycle bombs and mortars in the urban areas of the country. It is clear that the attacks will not abate, and also that the number of ways the insurgents will wreak destruction is basically unlimited; the ways of killing other human beings in Iraq is limited only by the imagination of the killers.

We must recall that Iraq has not always been the festering sore of a nation that it now is. Whatever his negative qualities as a leader may have been, at least when Saddam Hussein was in power, Iraq wasn't up for grabs. When Saddam was in power, Iraq wasn't sucking up the money of the United States and the lives of our military personnel. When Saddam was in power, that region of the world was relatively stable -- as stable as that region has been in the last fifty years or so.

Not that Saddam was all good and no bad. It's hard to see through the dust cloud of lies and deceit kicked up by the American-Jewish media, but it seems to me that Saddam had the qualities that were necessary to rule and maintain order in an Arabic society. It's my contention that most Westerners who criticize Saddam for his tactics as the leader of Iraq don't realize that those tactics are the result of the cultural and historical environment of the Arabic people, as well as the innate tendencies of the Arabic race-soul. Not that I understand the Arabic culture and race-soul any better than the next White man, but at least I have an awareness and an appreciation for racial differences, and I'm willing to give Saddam the benefit of the doubt by saying that he did what he did while he was in power because that was what was required in Iraq.

It wasn't too long ago, in fact, that the American government didn't think Saddam was such a bad guy, either. The Americans gave Saddam all kinds of aid -- to the tune of about 1.2 trillion U.S. dollars -- during the war between Iran and Iraq from 1980 to 1988. Those were the days when the media in the U.S. was hard at work demonizing the Islamic Republic of Iran, which had been formed in 1979 when Islamic hard-liners kicked out the Shah and set up Iran as a politico-religious state in the Middle East.

As we look back on the 1980s today, it is easy to see that the American-Jewish media helped to stir up in this country a feeling that the Iraqis were the good guys and the Iranians were the bad guys. Although there were definitely some issues between Iran and Iraq at the time, the American media exacerbated the problems and pushed hard enough that the U.S. openly aided Saddam and the Iraqis. One can also imagine that, during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, Jews everywhere were content and relaxed, knowing that the two main opponents of Israel in the Middle East were squandering their human and material resources on each other, with both of them too preoccupied to pay any attention to the Jewish state.

Saddam Hussein's fortunes took a turn for the worse shortly after he had -- in the view of certain elements of the American government -- worn out his usefulness as a game-cock in the cockfight between his country and Iran. With Iran's economic capacity destroyed -- and almost two decades later, Iran's oil industry is still not fully recovered -- America told Saddam to shove off and fend for himself.

And so Saddam did just that. He invaded Kuwait in 1990, conforming to the entrenched belief in Iraq that the union between the two countries while they had been ruled by the Ottoman Turks had NOT dissolved with the breakup of the Ottoman Empire after World War I. And now that Iraq was swinging the biggest stick in the Middle East -- besides Israel, of course -- the Americans (who are always eager to "do good for Jews") lined up Saddam in the crosshairs.

So, a mere three years removed from being Saddam's ally, the United States -- led by the fearless, first President George Bush -- launched Operation Desert Storm, which also became known as the Gulf War. Ostensibly, its purpose was to "save Kuwait" -- as if anyone in Washington gives a rat's ass for Kuwait or Iraq -- but White racialists know that its real purpose was to put Saddam in his place and make sure that his power in the Middle East didn't grow so large that he might threaten Israel.

Unfortunately for George Herbert Walker Bush's political fortunes, he didn't do his job well enough. Yes, he presided over the "liberation" of Kuwait and destroyed a good portion of Saddam's army and resources, but the job destruction wasn't good enough to satisfy the Jews who rule the roost in the American media command centers. After all, Saddam was still in power. He still maintained more-or-less absolute control throughout Iraq. He was still a magnetic leader who had his own ideas about the forces that controlled the world outside Iraq. And he still advocated strongly for the Palestinians in their struggle to reclaim the land stolen from them by the Israelis. All of these things -- that George H. W. Bush DIDN'T take care of when he had the chance -- contributed to the less-than-lukewarm support that Bush got from the Jewish media during the 1992 presidential election campaign.

For those of us who remember that campaign, it was highlighted by businessman Ross Perot, who conveniently decided to enter the race in a bid to reach the White House as an independent. It is no secret that Perot drew away some of the conservative vote from Bush, and that allowed the smooth-talking media darling Bill Clinton to take up residence on Pennsylvania Avenue.

During the Clinton Era, the American-Jewish media considered Iran to be basically a smashed-up and poverty-stricken nation of religious nutcases. Saddam Hussein and Iraq were still recovering from the Iran-Iraq war and the Gulf War. For these reasons, Clinton didn't need to bother with the Middle East very much. Israel was the only viable military power in the region, and so rather than directing the attention of the American electorate and government at other Middle East issues that needed fixing -- such as Israel's oppression of the Palestinians and its notorious practice of being one of the largest traffickers of human beings on the planet -- they instead pointed out to us that not all nations were pleased at being told what to do by Bill Clinton and his Jewish advisors.

One such nation was Serbia, which was led by the late Slobodan Milosevic. Milosevic was a nationalistic Serb who wanted land that was safe for Serbs, and he wanted to do things his own way, rather than toe the line that was drawn out for him by the Western powers. So we were treated to all kinds of horror stories about the atrocities committed by the Serbs against the Albanians and about how terrible Milosevic's allies were acting in, for example, Kosovo.

Well, Bill Clinton fixed him. The men whispering in Clinton's ear made it clear to him that the world they envisioned had no place for dissidents like Milosevic, and that he'd better do something about it, which he did. Serbia was bombed into submission by NATO and Milosevic spent essentially the rest of his life in captivity, vainly trying to explain his belief that constitutions apply to peoples (like Serbs, or Germans, or Scots), NOT to polyglot nations like the United States or the former Yugoslavia. Milosevic died an object of ridicule by the Western media, labeled as a hopeless wacko whom it was better to have behind bars rather than in the political arena, spouting off his "nonsense" about self-determination for Serbs, when such ideas are clearly outmoded. At least, that's what we were told by the Jewish media, which doesn't want self-determination for any White ethnicity, and certainly not for the entire White race.

But Saddam Hussein had not been idle during the 1990s. So by the time George W. Bush smirked his way into the White House after the 2000 election, Saddam had put Iraq back onto a more-or-less firm footing. Sure, it wasn't much to worry about, but the American-Jewish media are always on the lookout to be proactive in taking care of any possible threats to Israel. So when the dust had cleared after the catastrophe of 9/11, Bush started looking for a scapegoat.

And who fit the profile better than Saddam? He was still as defiant of the United States as ever. He still was adamant in his demands for Israel granting rights and land to Palestinians, and he did what he could to aid the Palestinian freedom fighters. Bush and the Jews around him must have decided to cook up as much dirt on Saddam as they could, then they could ride that momentum of public indignation to sweep Saddam out of power.

So that's what they did. They said that Saddam helped to finance the 9/11 attacks. They said that Saddam had stockpiled large quantities of chemical and biological weapons, the so-called "weapons of mass destruction." They said that Saddam had attempted to buy uranium for use in nuclear weapons from African nations, and they hinted that he might have already succeeded in that venture. And of course they dragged out a bunch of sob-stories about all of the nasty things Saddam had done in his efforts to reign in all of the bickering elements within his country.

It worked. True, we decided to put down Afghanistan first, but Iraq was Bush's target all along. Iraq was destroyed, Saddam was captured, and everything was good -- at least, it was good for the Israelis, who didn't have to worry about a united Iraq anymore and could smile in satisfaction that those annoying Palestinians wouldn't be getting any more aid from THAT quarter.

And here we are, more than three years later -- years after President Bush told us that the hostilities had ended -- and the road ahead in Iraq is as hopeless as ever. It took the occupational forces forever to get a "unity" government and, when they did, the starry-eyed and trusting non-thinkers among us let themselves flirt with the thought that Iraq might just be on its way to "freedom" and "democracy." Well, so much for that idea. As if freedom and democracy can be hand-delivered to a nation that has never known either!

Not that the media Jews and government-advisor Jews who push the pawns around care one way or the other. After all, now there is one less enemy of Israel plotting to destroy the Rogue State. After all, it isn't their sons or husbands choking on sand and taking turns as target practice for Iraqis who want nothing more than the foreigners in Iraq to leave Iraq. We keep pumping money and warm bodies into Iraq, to no avail, and all Bush can think to say is, "We won't cut and run." There's a time and place for inspirational, "let's-give-'em-hell" speeches, but Bush doesn't seem to understand that everyone just rolls his eyes whenever George gets on his Iraq soapbox.

The fact that there cannot be an American solution to the issues in Iraq is shown by the results of a State Department poll revealed this past week. The poll was directed at Iraqi youth, and it centered on their responses to what was happening in their country. According to an AP article of October 23, here is what the poll found:

1. "Majorities" of youth believe that the violence in Iraq would decrease and that life would improve if the occupation forces left immediately.

2. "Strong majorities" of 15- to 29-year olds are opposed to joining the Iraqi police or its armed forces.

3. In many locales, "sizable numbers" of youth express support for the local militias, which carry on the guerilla war against both Iraqi and American targets.

In other words, the movers and shakers of Iraq's future see the war for what it is: a costly mistake that has destroyed Iraq. It was started on false premises, and it is being carried on under false promises -- promises made by George Bush to the effect that he can make Iraq "all better." He can't. He invaded and destroyed a sovereign nation, and we White racialists say he did it in order to take out an ally of the Palestinians and an enemy of Israel.

But when you've snubbed your nose at as many people as Israel has -- and when you've done it in such arrogant ways as Israel has -- it isn't a Jewish "happily ever after" now that Saddam is gone and Iraq lay in ruins. If it isn't Saddam as the head Arabic Jew-hater in the Middle East, someone else is happy to step up to the plate. In fact, it seems sometimes that the Arabic peoples are jockeying each other for position for the next chance to take a shot at the nation that treats every other -- especially the Arabic nations -- like dirt.

The recent war waged against Israel by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon is evidence that the smoldering coal of Arabic anger against Israel is far from out. And in the last year-and-a-half or so, a revitalized Iran has been a primary target of the American-Jewish media. At the prompting of the Jews, the U.S. has taken the point in decrying Iran's attempts to generate electricity from nuclear power, and time will tell as to how that cat-fight will turn out.

But there's no honorable way out of Iraq for George Bush. He'll continue to take the heat for it -- and one day he'll be the fall guy -- but the Jews behind the scenes who talked Bush into it will anonymously slip away.

So enough of the nonsense. It's time for a nation that will respect and cooperate with all others. It's time for a nation that will conduct itself honorably in dealing with others and that will call Israel to account when it oppresses non-Jewish populations. It's time for a nation that will be guided by ideals such as truth, responsibility, and accountability. It's time for a nation that views the protection and elevation of the White gene pool as the highest good.

Join the National Alliance, and help us form that nation.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.