A positive sign is that fewer Americans are relying on newspapers for information and more are using the Internet.




Hello, and welcome back to this week's edition of American Dissident Voices. I'm your host, Erich Gliebe.

Last week, we talked on this program about what Fate has in store for our people unless we get our act together. As many historical examples have shown -- and as I discussed last week -- our people cannot exist intermingled with other races. The inevitable result of our long-term and widespread contact with other peoples is intermarriage and, in light of our numbers relative to rapidly-expanding non-White populations, our racial element is gradually buried beneath the genes of alien peoples.

This White racial dissolution occurs even when legal and cultural barriers are set up in opposition to racial mixing between Whites and non-Whites. Many times throughout history, our people have come into contact with non-Whites. Often, our people conquered the more numerous non-White populations and then attempted to keep the non-Whites around as working-class laborers. Call them slaves, if you want, but every people down through the ages has both enslaved and BEEN enslaved, and you shouldn't believe the lie that the only race to ever enslave anyone else has been ours -- as the Jewish media seem to suggest. In fact, the biggest criminal with regard to the present trafficking in human beings is the Jewish state of Israel -- as we've discussed at various times in the recent past -- but that's another story that I'm sure will come up again some other time.

Anyway, when our ancestors conquered non-White peoples, there were often legal barriers set up to prevent the mixing of the different races. As I understand it, the caste system that has become synonymous with India throughout its history was basically an attempt by the Aryan invaders who conquered India around 1500 B.C. to keep the Aryan bloodline separate from the subjugated non-White natives. The White South in the United States had all sorts of segregation laws on the books since the founding of the country in the late 18th century, and those laws disappeared only after the total defeat of the Old White South during the Civil Rights Era of the last century.

Popular prejudice among the White populations was also a strong deterrent for the same purpose of maintaining racial purity. The herd instinct that is natural for any cohesive racial group must have played a strong role in every instance when Whites and non-Whites co-existed on the same land. We certainly know of a multitude of examples over the last few centuries. When the British colonized America, parts of the South Pacific, and Africa, they were very careful at first to limit the contact between Whites and non-Whites to business only. Social interaction was frowned upon and severely dealt with, in some cases. Even today, among some White people who don't think of themselves as being overt racists, there is strong resistance to young Billy or young Sue bringing home a non-White. Granted, that resistance is weaker today than it has ever been, but nonetheless it is still there.

But in every case in which Whites and non-Whites have co-existed, the long-term result has been the loss of that segment of the White gene pool forever. With time, laws have broken down or not been enforced, White racial consciousness has been forgotten by the masses, and widespread racial amalgamation ensues. Within a few centuries at most, the White element of the population is almost completely gone, and any Whites left are so few in number that they have no power to reshape society along the lines of our people's needs: racial separatism.

Let me reiterate that the ONLY alternative for us is separation. We MUST have our own living space, in which we are free to live and breathe as White men and women, with a society that is structured to cultivate the inherent needs and desires of our race. Only in this way can we best assure that our people will live on. History has shown what happens to our people when we live in close proximity with alien races, no matter what intentions we start out with to the contrary.

Any proposed solution to our racial situation must therefore include the mandate that we have a homogeneous White living space. That is the starting point; we can discuss the rest, but on THAT point there will be no discussion.

But in order to get to that starting point, we in the National Alliance are attempting to build our organization into a force that has the strength to bring these issues into the national spotlight. In fact, we intend to build an organization that can influence not only events and opinions in the United States, but also throughout the entire White world. I mentioned last week that all Whites worldwide are in the same boat, so it shouldn't surprise you that we feel more of a connection to any White from another country (England, Germany, or Italy, for example) than we do for a non-White co-worker who happens to be an American citizen.

Building the organization that we in the National Alliance envision is no easy task, and it isn't made any easier by the hundreds of thousands -- perhaps millions -- of Whites who know the truth about our race's plight and about the Jewish control of our media and government, but who are NOT doing anything. If you tuned in last week, you might remember the frustration I expressed about the apathy and passivity that are widespread throughout our people today. We have in our hands today the unchallengeable truth about the darkening racial situation in traditionally White nations, and we also have the historical truth about how Nature deals with White groups that mix with non-Whites. As I discussed last week, those are ominous facts, but there is still hope. If we act on that hope, our people WILL secure the future that we in the National Alliance envision.

The signs that there is hope are many, but amid all of the bad news, one needs to know where to look for the faintest glimmerings of the good.

One sign comes from the popular, largely-Jewish media itself. After years of referring to the National Alliance as a White "supremacist" organization, some elements in the popular media are beginning to refer to us, albeit a bit grudgingly, by the more accurate term of a White "separatist" organization.

Let me briefly explain the difference between the two terms. A "supremacist" ideology implies that one group wishes to dominate one or more other groups. Now, to dominate other groups, it is a necessary condition that the various groups must be in close proximity to each other; basically, they must reside within one political entity.

For us White separatists, on the other hand, DISTANCE between our race and other racial groups is one of the governing tenets of our worldview. I've said many times on this program that we have no wish to dominate other groups; we simply want to be left alone on our own land and with a government that is dedicated to looking out for the best interests of our race. We are proud of the historical accomplishments of our people and of ourselves as dedicated racialists, but questions of superiority and inferiority play no part in our worldview. In our view, the unique traits that set our people apart from all others are -- in themselves -- worth preserving, and we racialists don't even think about the concept of superiority any more. The only reason it is still around is because the Jewish media keep dredging it up in their smear campaigns against well-meaning people they label as "haters."

In fact, one might make a convincing argument for the White race being inferior to many of the other races in the sense that, although the facts of our decline are well-known and widely understood, the majority of our people refuse to stand up in an effort to save themselves. Whether that claim is true or false depends largely on one's point of view but, for us, the claim is neither here nor there. We still love our people and we still believe that there are seeds of greatness within our race, and we plan to fight until we have what we want, in spite of any argument to the contrary. For us, our race's journey isn't over yet; we still have great things to do and even greater people to become, and the only shot we've got for filling that tall order is complete and total separation.

So for even a portion of the media to be calling the National Alliance a White separatist organization, it's a small but significant victory. I'm not really sure WHY some elements in the media have elected to call us by the more accurate name. I'd like to think that it has something to do with all of the Alliance's popular outreach programs speaking with one voice on this count, to the point that the mainstream media that are paying attention have assimilated the more appropriate term "separatist" rather than the traditional and incorrect term "supremacist."

More likely, though, is that certain portions of the media have imagined that they will appear to be untruthful in the eyes of mainstream Whites by forever insisting on the term "supremacist," and the media overlords don't want THAT. But even that explanation bodes well for Our Cause; it shows that our outreach efforts are now widespread enough that they are changing the way people think, both among mainstream Whites and among the media powers. You can count on us continuing to hammer away in our efforts to change MORE minds and MORE events in society at large.

The widespread dialogue on the official version of the so-called "Holocaust" is another small victory for the Cause of the Alliance. It wasn't very long ago that the overwhelming majority of Americans believed in the official (and, I might add, FALSE) version of the story, which basically goes like this: The German National Socialists set out to exterminate the entire Jewish race, they set up death camps like Auschwitz to carry out their plan, and they succeeded in killing roughly six million Jews.

Now, any honest person who has carefully weighed the evidence presented, on the one hand, by proponents of the official Holocaust story with, on the other hand, the evidence presented by the self-styled revisionists is forced to conclude that the official version simply did NOT happen. No one denies that Jews had a tough time during the Second World War. No one denies that thousands of Jews -- probably in the neighborhood of 300,000 -- lost their lives in that war. No one denies that some vigilante partisan groups on the Eastern Front that consisted largely of Jews were rounded up and set before German firing squads after being caught killing German troops or sabotaging supply lines.

What the revisionists DO refute are the false claims that the Germans had any kind of extermination program, that the camps were death camps, and that six million Jews were willfully exterminated. In truth, as the revisionists show, there was NO such plan, the camps were incarceration/labor camps, and nowhere near six million Jews died.

Fifteen years ago, no one had heard of historical revisionists. Today, they are constantly mentioned in the media. Granted, they are always given negative press, but a large segment of the public is at least slightly open to the idea that perhaps the garbage about soap made from Jewish fat and lampshades made from Jewish skin is just a load of nonsense.

Of course, the Jews aren't too happy about the truth trying to break out of its shell. Iran, that loose cannon of a nation that seems to get along quite well by NOT doing what the Jews want, hosted a multinational Holocaust Revisionist Conference this past week. Well-known Western revisionists like David Irving, Ernst Zundel, and Germar Rudolf are now behind bars for their heresy, as the Jews try to push the truth back into the box and shut the lid tight. The bad news for our opponents is that the more they try to squelch the truth, the more it will spread.

I'm waiting for the day when everyone admits that, yes, the official Holocaust story was, in fact, a big lie. You can bet the Jews will try to put some sugar-coated spin on it, so we'd better be ready to counter those silky-smooth denials and then push ahead with our racial plans.

In addition, it is now accepted by every American with even a grain of sense that the Iraq war has utterly failed. No matter what one's viewpoint was at the start of the war, it is now obvious that the Iraq war has been a dismal failure. The U.S. has destroyed a sovereign country and spent billions upon billions of dollars -- and 3,000 American lives -- without any tangible return on that investment. With regard to the National Alliance, our position on Iraq remained consistent from when Iraq and Saddam Hussein first began making the news shortly after 9/11. We were right.

I mentioned a few weeks ago when discussing the incoming wave of Democrats that would wash over the Congress in January that it was, in fact, quite possible we would pull out of Iraq soon. The reason I gave was NOT that the heroic Democrats had finally come to save the day. Instead, the reason I gave was that, as far as the Jews are concerned, the Iraq war has been a smashing success. Saddam is gone, and Iraq has been reduced to a non-entity, in terms of power in the Middle East. So -- make no mistake about it -- it is gratifying for us that the large majority of the country agrees with us about the war, but we still have a lot of teaching to do as to WHY the war happened in the first place and WHY it is now possible that a pull-out might occur. Basically, we went to war to destroy an enemy of Israel, and now that that enemy is destroyed, it is okay for us to leave. THAT is the deal.

Illegal immigration, too, is now a hot topic among a wide swath of the American population. Lou Dobbs talks about the issue nearly every day on his CNN broadcast, and even some elected officials -- like Colorado representative Tom Tancredo -- are being very vocal in their opposition to illegal immigration. Now, stopping illegal immigration isn't the end of the story for White racialists; we demand a living space free of ALL non-Whites, legal or otherwise. But stopping illegal immigration is a good place to start, and it gives us a launching point on our way to achieving our ultimate goal of total separation.

Another small victory for us -- although it might not seem that way at face value -- is that more and more people are failing to renew their subscriptions to daily newspapers. Instead, an ever-increasing number of Americans are using the Internet to obtain their information. This is good news for us, since the Internet gives one access to EVERY viewpoint on an issue, not just the viewpoints that the Jews want people to be exposed to. Unlike television, newspapers, and magazines, the Internet allows the user to consider -- if he chooses -- a wider variety of opinions on particular issues. In other words, the Internet allows people to compare our claims and our values side-by-side with those of the Jews. Now, it is true that, in many cases, people who are checking out the National Alliance's online sources of information are still under the thumb of the Jewish worldview that they have been exposed to their whole lives, but with time those views can change, and this parity with the Jews that we enjoy on the Internet is a major boost forward for Our Cause.

So we are definitely winning a few small battles, here and there. We must now take these small victories and turn them into bigger ones, and we must capture more and more and more small victories until our job is done.

It's like there's a heavy wagon at the bottom of a hill. There's a lot of mud down there and it's cold, with a brisk wind. If the wagon can be moved up the hill some distance, then the weather improves: there isn't as much mud, it's more comfortable, and the wind dies down somewhat. The further we go up the hill, the better things get, and the best place to be is at the top.

As I've mentioned in this broadcast, the White men and women the world over who care about their race are starting to move that heavy wagon up the hill. We haven't gotten it very far yet, but everywhere we look, more and more Whites are answering the call and putting their shoulders behind the cart. That, of course, is great news, because pushing that wagon to the top is analogous to achieving our White racial homeland.

But let's not stop partway up the hill. Even though we're making progress and things are beginning to look better, we mustn't let up, even for a minute. Because what might happen is that people who were actively pushing might suddenly notice the great improvement in the weather and the many people who have gotten behind the cart and think, "Well, I've done my part. I'm taking it easy from now on."

If too many people do that, the cart will slow down...and then stop...and then begin to roll back down the hill. No; instead, we in the White Racial Cause need to make sure that our cart keeps going up. And not just that. Our cart must continually be going upward faster and faster; it must accelerate on its way up so that the cart momentarily becomes airborne when it reaches our White racial homeland at the top...before we deal with all of the new obstacles that await us there.

It's not really a question of whether or not the truth about the racial situation or the Jews plans to rub out our race will come out or not. They WILL come out, and they are doing so right now, and on an ever-larger scale. The real question is whether or not enough dedicated and capable Whites of goodwill will answer the call of the blood and join the Cause for White freedom and self-determination.

There is no excuse for sitting on the sidelines. Ignorance of the facts is not an issue, because the racial facts about the present moment are well-known, and the racial facts about what will happen if we don't answer the call are known. Help us in the National Alliance turn our small victories into bigger ones, and give your own life meaning in the process.

I'm Erich Gliebe, Chairman of the National Alliance, and thanks for being with me again today.