American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 24, 2007
The Jews and Racial Loyalty
By Erich Gliebe

Hello, and welcome once again to American Dissident Voices, the
Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host
and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

White racialists are convinced that there is something unique
about our people, something that sets them apart from every other
race on this planet. Every race, I imagine, feels the same way;
the Jews even go so far as to claim that they are God's chosen
people, above all others, and they make it a basic point of their
interactions with other races to do everything possible that
those races, too, profess to believe that the Jews are God's
chosen ones. White Christians are highly susceptible to falling
prey to this Jewish trap since, after all, without the Jews, the
Christian religion wouldn't exist -- at least that's the line of
thinking of the mainstream churches. Ironically, without the
Jews, the religion of Islam wouldn't exist either, but Muslims
don't seem to be infected with the same sort of Hebrewphilia that
White Christians are.

But it isn't just the White Christians. Most all Whites have come
to accept that the Jews are unique -- which, granted, they ARE --
but what's worse is that most Whites also seem to accept that the
world OWES the Jews just about everything. The indefatigable
Jewish media establishment keeps that fire burning brightly by
constantly replaying the old half-truths and outright lies about
historical events like the so-called Holocaust and the
persecution and deportation of Jews down through the ages. There
is no doubt that the Jews have had a hard time of it at various
points in history, but feeding off the wealth and labor of
racial-national citizenries and expecting everyone to think you
are -- literally -- God's gift to mankind sometimes comes back to
bite you.

Of course, from a White perspective, this Jewish braggadocio --
this Jewish arrogance and cockiness -- is intolerably annoying,
as is clearly demonstrated by the attitude that eventually
catches hold in Gentile nations, which then inevitably results in
the Jews being kicked out. By comparison, the racialist position
of the National Alliance -- which is that the White race is a
unique creation that is worth preserving and that therefore
deserves its own homeland, free from the influence and
interference of all others -- is incredibly sensible. The stark
difference in the outlook of the Jews as compared with the
outlook of the National Alliance is evident. Basically, for the
Jews, it's a "we deserve to feed off of your work and wealth"
mentality, whereas for us, it's a "leave us alone and let us do
it ourselves" mentality.

Anyway, my point is that every race considers itself special in
some way, and we racialist Whites are no different from, say, the
Jews in that respect, or even racio-centric Latinos, Blacks,
Arabs, or Chinese. So why is it that our people are on the brink
of extinction, while the Jews and the other races, by all outward
signs, seem to be eluding that same danger?

There are a couple of answers to that question. One answer is
that a smaller percentage of Whites than, say, Jews are
accustomed to thinking of things in racial terms. Too many of
them have the wrong categories in mind when they evaluate the
people and the world around them. Some Whites think in terms of
"Republican versus Democrat" or, perhaps more accurately,
"conservative versus liberal." Whichever side of that fence our
kinsmen fall on, they can rationalize the problems we have in our
society as being the result of those on the other side of the
fence wielding too much power.

Many White Christians are the same way. They divide people into
two different categories: "Christian" and "unbeliever." To these
Whites, a Black Christian is closer to their heart than is a
White agnostic who believes that the existence of God can't be
proven, based on the currently available scientific and
historical evidence.

In the decades following the Second World War, many Whites
divided the world into "free" and "communist," to cite yet
another example.

The problem we White racialists see with all of this is that most
Whites simply don't choose the right categories to divide people
and the world into. Most people choose categories that just
AREN'T IMPORTANT, in terms of the long-range survival and
progress of our people. Plain and simple: too many of us are
making bad choices. The Jews, on the other hand, have adapted
themselves to making the right choice almost every time; the
right choice from the Jewish point of view, that is.

And that right choice is the one that most benefits Jews and
their aims for power. In the Jews' minds, the two categories of
featherless bipeds are "Jews" and "goyim," the latter term being
a Hebrew word whose literal translation is "human cattle." Our
race, of course, would be much better off if all our kinsmen
divided humans into the two categories, "White" and "other
people," the latter term being a bit more respectful to the
non-White races than the Jewish "other" word, "goyim."

Anyway, unlike most Whites, most Jews tend to put the interests
of their own race first, no matter which side of whatever fence
people are on. For example, in the early years of the 20th
Century, there was a strong Jewish presence in the Bolshevik
movement in Russia. Vladimir Lenin, for example, was one-fourth
Jewish. Leon Trotsky, one of the leading intellectuals of Marxist
thought in Russia, was a full-blooded Jew whose given name was
Bronstein. When the Bolsheviks took over Russia to form the
Soviet Union in 1917, Jews made up an overwhelming portion of the
commissars who were responsible for the implementation of
government policy at the local level and who therefore had broad
powers that they used to help or hinder the rest of the
population as they saw fit.

But at the same time that the Jews were cooking up trouble in
Russia -- with the long-range plan of exporting Communism
throughout the West -- they also had their hands in up to the
elbows of international finance and loan capital. That is, Jewish
bankers and financiers pulled the strings not only in the world
of communism, but also in the world of capitalism, accumulating
wealth and power at every opportunity. So while their Jewish
kinsmen in the Soviet Union were railing against the evils of
capitalism and managing what was essentially a terrorist state --
what with the induced famines, arrests without trial, seizure of
private property, and its enormous network of forced-labor camps
-- Jewish capitalists were filling their coffers through
international dealings and simultaneously leading Gentile nations
into treacherous economic waters.

Incidentally, it was international Jewish finance that drove one
of the 20th Century's great poets, the American Ezra Pound, into
the world of politics. Pound went to Europe and worked for
Fascist Italy's radio broadcasting service during the Second
World War. At any rate, Ezra Pound wasn't the only person who
noticed during the early decades of the 20th Century that Jews
were at the helm of international finance. Actually, it was
fairly common knowledge among the literate public at the time.

So in the early 20th Century, the Jews were holding the reins of
both capitalism and communism, and they were working both to
their best advantage for the well-being of Jews. They saw clearly
that the ideology -- whether it be capitalism, communism, or
what-have-you -- takes second place to the race. As long as the
ideology is working toward those ends, then that's fine, but the
minute it fails to do that, then it is okay to jump ship and go
with something else.

In the United States, for instance, there was a great Jewish
ship-jumping from the Left to the Right following the
winding-down of the Civil Rights movement in the late 1970s and
early 1980s. The Civil Rights movement, which was a Leftist
conception to the core and which really began to get under way
during the 1950s, was largely guided by Jews. As an example, for
decades the various presidents of the NAACP were Jews. Jews led,
organized, and financed most of the other communist-front and
racial integration organizations, too.

And the Jewish genius for subversive activity paid off. By the
late 1970s, all the racial segregation laws in the U.S. had been
torn down, a new immigration bill that successfully destroyed the
traditional racial quotas on immigration into the U.S. had been
passed, and the Jewish vision of a racially-darker America was
beginning to take hold, especially among younger Americans.

But then something strange happened. Young Americans who had so
energetically agitated for self-determination for the Blacks of
Rhodesia and South Africa began to extend the idea of
self-determination to other groups, including the Palestinians
and the other Arab peoples in the vicinity of Israel. Those who
had so clamored for the destruction of U.S. segregation laws
using the rationale that such laws held down American Blacks
began to think that similar laws in Israel -- whose purpose was
to keep the Jewish and Palestinian populations separate (at least
psychologically) -- were equally in need of abolition. One can
imagine the consternation expressed at meetings of powerful
American Jews at that time of what to do about the Gentile
monster that they had created with all of their media coverage
and money and influence. "Oy, vey!" they must have exclaimed.
"How dare the Gentiles even think to apply the same standard of
racial equality -- a bogus idea that WE TAUGHT THEM and that any
moron can see is false -- to our beloved Israel and those
Palestinian vermin?"

Former President Jimmy Carter's well-meaning attempts to create a
lasting peace and understanding in the Middle East between Israel
and its Arab neighbors -- attempts that ultimately failed --
proved to be the last straw for most thinking Jews in positions
of power. They kept a tight control of the American media, of
course, but they made sure that their front-line "Jews in the
field" either found other ways to busy themselves or at least
greatly toned down their inflammatory rhetoric about racial
equality.

And that pretty much did the trick. Without the constant Jewish
media coverage, the racial equality wagon got stuck in the mud.
Without the radical Jewish grass-roots leadership, most of the
racial-equality groups sputtered and coughed themselves into
retirement. Throughout the Reagan years of the 1980s, the focus
was now turned -- by the Jewish media -- away from Israel as an
oppressor of Arabs and toward Israel as an ally against the
super-bogeyman of evil: the Soviet Union which, somewhat
ironically, would never have come into being at all if it hadn't
been for the subversive activity of Russian Jews some eighty
years before.

The Arab nations, we were told at the time, were allied with the
nasty USSR and so it was only natural that we, the USA, should be
closely allied with a nation who stood similarly against the
Arab-Soviet menace. Rarely was Israel's ghastly human rights
record brought up in the media anymore. All that mattered was the
Cold War, now renewed and invigorated by a smooth-talking,
actor-polished American President whose bizarre beliefs in
numerology and other such hocus-pocus bordered on the
embarrassingly laughable.

So by the end of the 1970s, many Jews had jumped ship from the
Left to the Right. The racial-equality pish-posh that had proved
so useful and that the Jews had used to such advantage during the
Civil Rights Era had outlived its usefulness. Segregation was
gone, the races were at least partially integrated, immigration
barriers had been torn down, and a constant prodding by the
Jewish media masters with their hands on the levers of power
would be more than sufficient to keep the ball rolling in the
right direction, as far the Jews were concerned.

So the radical Leftism that most Jews had embraced after the
Second World War was abandoned, and a new tactic presented itself
in the 1980s. The conservative and Rightist Ronald Reagan was the
new champion of all that stood in defiance of Soviet aggression
and, for one thing, that meant that he was the new champion of
Israel. And because Reagan wanted a strong national defense, it
also meant that anyone who dealt in government defense contracts
was going to make a haul in taxpayers' money. As a result, the
economy picked up and, Jews being Jews -- and having maintained
their positions of power in the financial and corporate worlds --
they were able to line their pockets better than the rest of us
were in those blissful days. Moreover, the booming economy gave
everyone something positive to think and talk about, and it made
people not worry so much about who was moving in next door or
about what was going on daily on our southern border with Mexico.

Furthermore, the Reagan years saw a rebirth of enthusiasm in the
Christian churches all across the U.S., but particularly among
fundamentalist sects of Christianity. The American military and
economic alliance with Israel was a feel-good narcotic for
Bible-beating White Christians, who viewed that alliance as our
teaming-up with "God's chosen people" -- that is, the people for
whom the Old Testament God Yahweh allegedly slaughtered tribe
after tribe of heathen Gentiles to clear out the desert in front
of his special ones. This mental association that Christians have
with Jews and with Israel continues to this day, although it is
most prominent among the fifty- or sixty-somethings, especially
those who lean toward religious fundamentalism.

Through all of this, the Jews have maintained their dedication to
the well-being of their own, all ideologies be damned. This is
what the late Dr. William Pierce meant when he said that a Jew is
NOT a communist or a capitalist or a liberal or a conservative…
or any other label that would normally have a concrete meaning
when attached to a person.

A Jew is simply a Jew, and that's it. A Jew is simply a Jew, and
that's all that one really needs to know…as long as one
understands what a Jew is.

Anyway, from the point of view of the National Alliance today,
neither the ends of the Jews nor their means to those ends are
examples worth mimicking.

For example, all of the available evidence suggests NOT that Jews
wish to seek their own destiny apart from that of every other
race, but rather they seek to promote and enhance the Jewish race
by lording-it-over and feeding off of other races. White
racialists generally, and the National Alliance in particular,
want instead a separate White homeland and political
self-determination, clear and free from the interference of other
races.

We don't agree with the Jews on the ends, and neither do we agree
on means. Historically and at present, the Jews use tactics that
we Whites find dishonorable. In large measure -- especially
against threats that strike close to the heart of racial matters
-- the Jews deal in deceit and treachery, in behind-the-scenes
maneuvering, in scare tactics, and by threats of terror. We
Whites understand such tactics, but we can't stomach them. We
prefer face-to-face, no-frills dealing, with everything out in
the open. This is why the proverbial "stab in the back" is such
an odious act; we Whites have an innate tendency to gravitate
toward honorable contests and shy away from ones in which one
side has an unfair advantage. The other races, Jews included,
have no such innate tendency.

However, for all of their (what I perceive to be) grievous
faults, the Jews must be given credit for maintaining their
loyalty to their own people and for acting on behalf of their
race. Unlike East Asians, South Asians, and Black Africans, whose
numbers provide insurance for those races as they march into the
future, the Jews are numerically inferior in every country they
inhabit, with the exception of Israel. Despite their relatively
small numbers, the Jews' tenacity for sticking together in racial
matters -- that is, WHERE IT COUNTS -- has made all the
difference for them.

We Whites need to learn to stick together on racial matters, and
we need to do so quickly. There IS something special about our
people, and we need to use that truth as motivation in securing
our race's most pressing need: a racial homeland. The time for
standing on the sidelines is over, and it's time to come to the
defense of your people, and to bring other Whites with you.

Don't let life pass you by. Get involved in the National Alliance
and in our program of racial renaissance.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of
ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

==> To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE to this mailing list go here:
http://www.natvan.com/mailing-list/

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. 
This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to
be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup
posting.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

SUBSCRIBE to NATIONAL VANGUARD, our unique, thought-provoking 
magazine -- $22 US, $30 Canada, and $40 Foreign.
This is for six high-quality, glossy color issues:

SEND $3 for our 88-page CATALOG of books and other items:

     National Vanguard Books
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Give $20
today!
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=599

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To report typos and technical errors in ADV-list or our web site,
please write to:
 webmaster@natvan.com   (Subject: TYPO)

The National Alliance: www.natvan.com & www.natall.com
National Vanguard Books: www.natvanbooks.com

(c) 2007 National Vanguard Books